Co-living of Youngs and Seniors (University Student and Elderly)

After the site trip, as the studio we move to second stage of the project: designing the project according to given human profiles. We are assigned to suggest some support functions for the design that is a response for young and seniors. Now, I will talk about what we did;

After the pre-jury, we changed the ideas about the renewable part. A suggestion from the jury was about complementary part that is moving. So, we thought that complementary parts can also be moveable and attach with the units as well.  The moveable parts of the complementary units are called as renewable spaces, since now we increase the usage time of them. We thought that, when the moveable parts are in the complementary units, they create a hall, when it moves the area still be used.


We describe the ratio of fragmentation according to needs of youngs and seniors. For example, we thought that the eating area is used by both profiles, on the other hand the gym can generally sed by youngs. We tried to fragment the complementary areas according to this idea.



Also, we tried to locate the complementary part and decide their square meter according to how many people will use them. Since we have some fragmentable complementary parts and unfragmentable complementary parts, we though that unfragmentable parts could be away from the units, while the fragmentable one is close to units in order to decrease the distance of moveable parts. We decide the square meter of the complementary parts according to how many people will use them. The bubble diagram below is showing these relations;


Another diagram we did is the time and the users in the units and complementary parts. You can see below that, when the time changes the people in the spaces is changing, too.


Lastly, we did a diagram to show how these fragmented parts are moving since it is hard to explain by only words.


As HELIX we like making moveable things, that’s why we have lots of gifs 😊

HELIX in the Site!


This semester, our site is in the Çayyolu, Ankara. As Helix, we are assigned to prepare the 3D model of the site. In order to do the site model, we need the plan update. But in the site trip, we try to analysis various aspects of the site and see the area that we will locate the housing project. The site that we will work is between the Nokta Architecture Building and Ankara Loft Building. It is close to Gordion AVM. From the observation, the site accessibility is very positive and even though it has slope, it will be the nice to work there.


HELIX | Pre-Jury I

As HELIX Design Studio, we started the presentation with the ideology of our offices, how we approach a design problem and what is the aim of HELIX. Since I already upload these parts in previous post, in this post I will try to explain the changes in our units and how we define the general scene of the project. We prepare a lot of plans, sections, 3D models, gifs and animations in order to explain ourselves clearly.

As you remember from my previous post, we were designing some units that changing their room numbers according to needs. In critics, we were said that when we change the room number, we should also gain something like an extra square meter, then it would be more meaningful. That’s why we think more about the units and we thought that after their movement, they gain an extra space that could be used more than one unit and we could that part renewable. While adaptation idea works inside of the units, renewable idea related with more than one unit, we may say.


These are the drawings and 3D versions of the units;











Also, the diagram below is showing the how we define the renewable parts for the structure;


We drew the combination of the units and tried to make a 3D model for variation BB (in diagram) AA (in drawings);



And lastly, we work on the complementary part. In our approach the complementary spaces are the one that act exactly a complement of the mass housing system. We tried to find some activities that complement the habitation environment and can be used for all inhabitants live there.


HELIX, Designing Units

Since this semester, we are designing a mass housing project, as a starter point, we began to design some units according to our strategies of office. We designed 1+0, 1+1, and 2+1 units, that is a respond to our adaptable strategy. This strategy can be understood to turning the 1+0 to 1+1, 1+1 to 2+1 and 2+1 to 3+1. They are adapting to needs. We define it like, when you need a bigger living room for your guest, it is attaching to living room. And then, when you need a private room, it is separating from the living room and create a private room as well. Since these units are adapting to needs, the furniture of the space is also changing according to needs. They are moveable and foldable furniture in the space.


Renewable part of the design is defined when the units are coming together. When two units come together, we design a space that is used for both units. So that, this space usage is increasing in time.

Complementary part is the spaces that served for all block. They are the complement part of the area such as gym, cinema, health center and so on. We thought that while the units come together complementary parts are designed to gather them.


Since, we have some sort of ‘mobility’ in our design, we did some case studies according to the mobile idea. These are Maison Bardeaux by Rem Koolhaas, Quadrant House by KWK Promes and Garden House by Caspar Schols. While Maison Bardeaux working vertically, Quadrant House working in a radiant way and Garden House working in a horizontal manner. These three cases analyzed in terms of the mobility idea of them.


Case Studies of HELIX

This semester, we are assigned to work on mass housing. The project name is ‘Living Together: Community Housing in Turkey. This project offers a communal living for teenagers and elders. So, two opposite side in one place.

As HELIX Design Studio, before starting the project we made some case studies. For these cases we looked adaptable spaces, communal living, and some other properties. For adaptable cases, we searched for moveable or mobile spaces. With the moveable spaces, we aimed to have adaptable spaces for different needs.

The cases include Rietveld Schröder House, The Glass House, Social Housing Refurbishment and, Unité d’Habitation. With those cases we became able to understand reacting different needs and social housing projects.