Okay… To be honest, it was the final assignment of Arch121 course we were assigned to listen at least 2 project from at least two juries. But I listened more than 2 because it was a new thing for me. In previous year, I mean at the ELS, I always planned to go juries but I couldn’t so it was the first time I went to a jury which is not mine. I understood most of the part of the juries especially second years students juries because it was not far away from what we did for this semester but when we came to third and fourth years juries it became hard to understand. I was still able to understand some part of the juries but as I said it became harder when the studios getting bigger. In the second years juries, they were more focusing on the relations which we are already aware of it, third years and fourth students was becoming more realistic than we did.
When this assignment was given the us, I planned to read books instead of going to juries but now I really appreciate to go them. I want to give an advice to read this blog: you should go to the juries and observe them as much as you can. It will help you to understand the juries more. I would like to write my report here, too but it was our assignment so most probably I shouldn’t. But you can see process from their blogges.